This entry was posted in Twitter on April 4, 2014 by twilight @patrix @gkjohn no? Something wrong with semantics?
Reply ↓ patrix April 4, 2014 at 19:48 @twilightfairy double entendre doesn’t work with something that was already intended to be sexual @gkjohn
@twilightfairy double entendre doesn’t work with something that was already intended to be sexual @gkjohn