This entry was posted in Twitter on August 26, 2015 by twilight @DrDonnaYates I read this in the newspaper and found it strange that such an expensive painting had no glass surface etc to protect!
Reply ↓ DrDonnaYates August 26, 2015 at 05:50 @twilightfairy It’s more common than you think. Many think glass is too reflective and reduces the impact and enjoyment of the painting.
Reply ↓ DrDonnaYates August 26, 2015 at 05:51 @twilightfairy It is a balancing act between security and viewer experience. e.g. when a guy punched a Monet http://t.co/AiOmWVBgta
Reply ↓ DrDonnaYates August 26, 2015 at 05:51 @twilightfairy The Monet was not behind glass because people like to study the impressionist brushstrokes…
@twilightfairy It’s more common than you think. Many think glass is too reflective and reduces the impact and enjoyment of the painting.
@twilightfairy It is a balancing act between security and viewer experience. e.g. when a guy punched a Monet http://t.co/AiOmWVBgta
@twilightfairy The Monet was not behind glass because people like to study the impressionist brushstrokes…